File Under: You Can’t Make This Stuff Up

“When a slave was drunk, the slaveholder had no fear that he would plan an insurrection.  No fear that he would escape to the north.  It was the sober thinking slave who was dangerous and needed the vigilance of the slaveholder to keep him a slave.”  –Frederick Douglass, 1846

Sober words indeed.  Words that for all practical purposes have been memory-holed because of their potency.  Words expressing sentiments that are not allowable as far as the globalist oligarchy is concerned.

Don’t believe me?

OK, then you explain this bit of evil nonsense: 

Really, seriously.  Why would anybody think this was a good idea?  Unless of course, you smoke crack.  (Hmm, now that I think about it, who do we know in the White House who has a family member who smokes crack?)

This is really ironic.  After all, this is Black History Month, and given the utter contempt which the Democrat Party has for black folks (sorry to shatter your illusions), what better way to celebrate it than announcing a plan to give away free crack pipes to “the Community.” 

All in the name of Diversity, Inclusiveness, and Equity (DIE)?

Seriously, this is insane.  Of course, we crossed the Clown-world Rubicon back on November 3rd of 2020, when we were informed that a demented old man who was confined to his basement for the election cycle was “elected” president.  Yep, Joe Biden got 12 million more votes than Barack Hussein Obama, Jr; the man who previously got more votes than any other candidate in history. 

Obama for that matter got more votes in 2008 than Nixon and Reagan (both of whom won 49 states each).  Biden we are to believe got more than the sitting president, who increased his personal vote share by 12 million votes as well, from 63 to 75 million (something else which has never happened in history).  Trump not only won eighteen of the 19 bell-weather counties that accurately predict presidential elections but the trifecta states of Florida, Iowa and Ohio which always guarantee the presidential winner.  Plus, he increased his vote share among white women, blacks, and Hispanics.  

I guess we could say that the mask is finally off.  As far as the Democrat Party (which is the provisional wing of the Establishment) is concerned, blacks have only one job to perform:  and that is to vote for their candidates come election time.  No other.  What did Biden say?  If you don’t vote for him you ain’t black. 

Used to be that they’d pay lip service to jobs, end of red-lining, integration, whatever it took.  In and of themselves, these were positive things all-in-all.  And to sweeten the pot, there was always government gibsmedat, things like welfare, AFDC, Medicaid, and so on.

But there is nothing at all positive or salutary about smoking crack.  Thats’s nichevo, zip, zilch, nada.

So why did the Democrats do it?  Four things pop into mind:

  1.  They’re bone-crushingly stupid.  We’re talking people with IQs approaching single digits.
  2.  They’re horribly out-of-touch.  Their amorality is so pervasive that they can’t help themselves.  If you suggest to them that cannibalism would be a good way to save on funeral costs they would pause and say “hmmm…”
  3. They’re desperate.  They’ve lost control of the narrative and despite their native ignorance of reality coupled with their degeneracy, they can see which way the wind is blowing.  And they’re scared. 
  4. They’re bat-sh!t insane.  Trump has so scrambled their brains that they’ve lost all sense of normal cognition. 

Scared of what?  As far as blacks are concerned, mainly this:  that increasingly, that voting bloc is gradually coming to their senses.  And that it’s becoming increasingly obvious to them that whenever a black man or woman comes out as a conservative (or a liberal-skeptic), the Establishment does everything in its power to destroy that person.

We’ve seen this time and time again:  Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, and the late Walter Williams –“Uncle Toms,” “house negroes,” and “lawn jockeys,” were some of the less horrible (believe it or not) epithets applied to them.  Now it’s Larry Elder’s turn, as well as Candace Owens, Alveda King, Leo Tyrrell, and others too numerous to mention here.  The well of hatred for blacks who are either conservative, Republican, or just skeptical of the Democrat Party is inexhaustible.  

It has to be.  Otherwise, the 92 percent of the black vote that goes for the Democrats every four years will whittle down to 90 percent, then 85, then 80.  Anytime a GOP candidate gets over 8 percent he wins (provided he keeps 60% of the white vote).  Don’t believe me?  George W Bush got 8 percent of the black vote in 2000 and Trump got the same amount in 2016.  Yeah, both elections were squeakers but it was those two men who placed their hands on the Bible on January 20th of 2001 and 2017 respectively, and were sworn in as president if memory serves. 

But let’s get back to the sheer evilness of the idea of handing out crack pipes.  Basically, I’m going with option #3:  that the Oligarchy is scared witless that they’re not only losing the narrative but also that the GOP is slowly but surely, chipping into the black vote, making it less monolithic.  

So now, they have to pull out all stops to get back in control.  Like all animals, they’re more dangerous when they’re backed into a corner.  That’s when they lash out.  It’s not a pretty sight but that’s what happens.  So if they have to take off the mask of the Concerned White Savior, so be it.  If they have to start a war in Eastern Europe they’ll do that as well, anything to distract the American population from noticing the disintegration of our nation.  They don’t care at this point.  It’s just them holding on to power, whatever the cost may be, no matter how ruined the wreckage left behind and resentful the people are. 

I believe it was Satan who said in Paradise Lost:  “It is better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven.”  What better encapsulation is there of our ruling elite?  How wretched must be their souls?

Will it work?  Not in the long run.  In the short run, however, it may buy them some time.  Sure, stunts like this make them look ridiculous but, like a cornered rat, a sense of decorum isn’t what’s called for when basic survival is at stake.  And truth be told, there’s a sliver of the black population that will probably be mollified by this gesture.  We can call this the “crack demographic,” people who are so far gone in the depths of their despair that they’ll take anything they can get, even if they’re free crack pipes.  Especially, if they’re free.

It’s pathetic.  And evil.  No two ways about it. 

But it’s also clarifying, isn’t it?  Like so many other things in the Age of Fauci, we know who our enemies are and what their agenda is.  As unfair as it is to label a principled black conservative an Uncle Tom or to throw an honest liberal like Joe Rogan under the bus, if that’s what it takes, so be it.  As for the rest of us, it makes it easier to know which way is up.  Invariably, it’s the opposite of whatever they say it is.  That’s how far unmoored from reality they are. 

It’s sad that we –blacks and whites–have had to learn the hard way.  It is my hope that we spend more time studying black heroes like Frederick Douglass, Booker T Washington, and Marcus Garvey who fought against the wallowing self-pity served to blacks by their white liberal “saviors” who have repeatedly let them down.  If these eminent men of color are too distant, then give a listen to Malcolm X.  He pegged white liberals as the “enemies of the Negro” sixty years ago.  Malcolm X wasn’t wrong.  And now, with the great crackpipe-giveaway, there’s no denying it.  It’s time for the truth to come to the fore so they can take back their dignity

PS, if you really want to see an example of white liberals putting an uppity black man in his place, take a look at the first 4 minutes of this video.  It’s absurd, ironic, and insane all wrapped up in one hilarious package:


  1. Do you really think the Biden administration will/would go to war with Russia? If so, wouldn’t that be as insane as anything else they’ve done? I mean Russia isn’t one of these ragtag Muslim gangs we’ve been fighting for the last 20 years. Russia has a big army too. And unlike ours, their military leaders aren’t pushing the intersectional narrative. Russia has nukes too, and their leader is crazy enough to use ’em. The scene in Rocky IV where Adrian confronts Rocky comes to mind: “YOU CAN’T WIN!”

  2. Damage control is in high gear. The authorities that be are now denying that crack pipes are part of the funding by HHS. The article that is linked to the FOX article has been pulled.
    When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout.
    If all this wasn’t pathetic it would be downright hi-larious.

  3. Working a crossword puzzle today, I came across this quote. Laws are silent in times of war. by Cicero

    • PS Seems as if we are in the middle of a civil war and most folks don’t realize it. It has begun. But many laws have been silenced during these last years. Keep praying everyone.

  4. Its because blacks vote democrat and love to smoke crack. Democracy is about bribing your electorate into robbing from the other group.

  5. Here’s a story on the story:

    They took down the original and if you google you will find attempts at “debunking” it, but it’s the God’s honest truth. HHS is supplying crackpipes to the black community. All the blowback on the story is along the lines of “Yes, but wait, we can explain.” Rather than, “You got the facts wrong.” I.e., the fact-checking and debunking are pure unadulterated spin on a hand to God honest story.


    It’s completely Third World, and I mean Mogadishu or Afghanistan, not Nicaragua. This is where the rubber meets the road. Outlets like Fox, let alone the MSM, if they want to salvage any integrity, cannot allow the Democrats to do outrageous stuff on the one hand and deny it “plausibly” on the other to tamp down outrage. That’s just enabling evil, pure and simple. At some point you have to be willing to turn up the volume and drown out the lies and wickedness if they are to be resisted and overcome. Otherwise, the Orwellian is inevitable.

  6. The Plan to Turn You Into a Genetically Edited Human Cyborg
    Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    February 14, 2022

    Story at-a-glance

    The U.K. Ministry of Defense and the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning Human stress that human augmentation needs to be a key area of focus to win future wars
    Human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It’s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite eventually using their augmented “super-human” status as justification to rule everyone else
    The goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution — introduced and pushed by the World Economic Forum — is transhumanism, the merging of man with machine
    Human augmentation can directly affect behavior, either positively or to the detriment of that person
    In the transhumanist view, the human body is a “platform” that can be augmented in myriad ways, physically, psychologically and socially

    A May 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning, offers shocking highlights of the dystopian cybernetics future that global technocrats are pushing mankind toward.

    The report, “Human Augmentation — The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,”1 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars.

    But human augmentation will not be restricted to the military ranks. It’s really a way to further separate classes of humans, with the rich and powerful elite being augmented “super-humans.” It’s worth noting that anything released to the public is a decade or more behind current capabilities, so everything in this report can be considered dated news, even though it reads like pure science fiction.

    “… the field of human augmentation has the potential to transform society, security and defense over the next 30 years,” the report states. “We must begin to understand the implications of these changes and shape them to our advantage now, before they are thrust upon us.

    Technology in warfare has traditionally centered on increasingly sophisticated platforms that people move and fight from, or artefacts that they wear or wield to fight with. Advances in the life sciences and converging developments in related fields are, however, beginning to blur the line between technology and the human …

    Many technologies that have the potential to deliver strategic advantage out to 2050 already exist and further advances will undoubtedly occur … Our potential adversaries will not be governed by the same ethical and legal considerations that we are, and they are already developing human augmentation capabilities.

    Our key challenge will be establishing advantage in this field without compromising the values and freedoms that underpin our way of life …

    When we think of human augmentation it is easy to imagine science fiction inspired suits or wonder drugs that produce super soldiers, but we are on the cusp of realizing the benefits in a range of roles now. Human augmentation will help to understand, optimize and enhance performance leading to incremental, as well as radical, improvements.”

    Changing What It Means To Be Human

    As noted in the report, “Human augmentation has the potential to … change the meaning of what it means to be a human.” This is precisely what Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), has stated is the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution.2

    WEF has been at the center of global affairs for more than 40 years, and if you take the time to dive into WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution material, you realize that it’s all about transhumanism. It’s about the merger of man and machine. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.

    Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers. As noted by history professor Yuval Noah Harari in late 2019, “humans are now hackable animals.”3 As noted in the featured report:4

    “Human augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines.

    Future wars will be won, not by those with the most advanced technology, but by those who can most effectively integrate the unique capabilities of both people and machines. The importance of human-machine teaming is widely acknowledged but it has been viewed from a techno-centric perspective.

    Human augmentation is the missing part of this puzzle. Thinking of the person as a platform and understanding our people at an individual level is fundamental to successful human augmentation.”

    Key words I’d like to draw your attention to is the affirmation that human augmentation can “directly enhance behavior.” Now, if you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone’s behavior. And if you can change a person’s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person’s own detriment.

    Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training.

    Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver.

    The Human Platform

    On page 12 of the report, the concept of the human body as a platform is described, and how various parts of the human platform can be augmented. For example:

    Physical performance such as strength, dexterity, speed and endurance can be enhanced, as well as physical senses. One example given is gene editing for enhanced sight
    Psychological performance such as cognition, emotion and motivation can be influenced to activate and direct desired behavior. Examples of cognitive augmentation include improving memory, attention, alertness, creativity, understanding, decision-making, intelligence and vigilance
    Social performance — “the ability to perceive oneself as part of a group and the readiness to act as part of the team” — can be influenced. Communication skills, collaboration and trust are also included here

    They list several different ways to influence the physical, psychological and social performance of the “human platform,” including genetics (germ line and somatic modification), the gut microbiome, synthetic biology, invasive (internal) and noninvasive (external) brain interfaces, passive and powered exoskeletons, herbs, drugs and nano technology, neurostimulation, augmented reality technologies such as external holograms or glasses with built-in artificial intelligence, and sensory augmentation technologies such as external sensors or implants. As noted in the report:

    “The senses can be extended by translating frequencies beyond the normal human range into frequencies that can been seen, heard or otherwise detected. This could allow the user to ‘see’ through walls, sense vibrations and detect airborne chemicals and changes to magnetic fields.

    More invasive options to enhance existing senses have also been demonstrated, for example, coating retinal cells with nanoparticles to enable vision in the infrared spectrum.”

    They also point out that, from a defense perspective, methods to de-augment an augmented opponent will be needed. Can you even imagine the battlefield of the future, where soldiers are barraged from both sides with conflicting inputs?

    As for ethics, the paper stresses that “we cannot wait for the ethics of human augmentation to be decided for us.” There may even be “moral obligations” to augment people, they say, such as when it would “promote well-being” or protect a population from a “novel threat.”

    Interestingly, the paper notes that “It could be argued that treatments involving novel vaccination processes and gene and cell therapies are examples of human augmentation already in the pipeline.” This appears to be a direct reference to mRNA and vector DNA COVID jabs. If so, it’s an open admission that they are a human augmentation strategy in progress.

    The Challenge of Unintended Consequences

    Of course, there can be any number of side effects and unintended outcomes when you start augmenting an aspect of the human body or mind. As explained in the featured report:

    “The relationship between augmentation inputs and outputs is not as simple as it might appear. An augmentation might be used to enhance a person’s endurance but could unintentionally harm their ability to think clearly and decisively in a timely fashion.

    In a warfighting context, an augmentation could make a commander more intelligent, but less able to lead due to their reduced ability to socially interact or because they increasingly make unethical decisions. Even a relatively uncontentious enhancement such as an exoskeleton may improve physical performance for specific tasks, but inadvertently result in a loss of balance or reduced coordination when not being worn.

    The notion of enhancement is clouded further by the intricacies of the human nervous system where a modifier in one area could have an unintended effect elsewhere. Variation between people makes designing enhancements even more challenging.”

    Still, none of that is cause to reconsider or slow down the march toward transhumanism, according to the authors. We just need to understand the human body better, and for that, we need to collect and analyze more data on human performance, behavior, genetics and epigenetics. As noted by the authors:

    “Devices that track movement, heart rate, oxygenation levels and location are already commonplace and will become increasingly accurate and sophisticated, making it possible to gather an increasingly wide array of performance data in real time. We can also analyze data in ways that were impossible even five years ago.

    Artificial intelligence can analyze massive sets of information almost instantaneously and turn it into products that can inform decision-making. This marriage of data collection and analytics is the foundation of future human augmentation.”

    Lab-Grown Designer Babies

    As mentioned, by the time a technological advancement is admitted publicly, the research is already a decade or more down the road. Consider, then, the February 1, 2022, article in Futurism,5 which announced that Chinese scientists have developed an artificial intelligence nanny robot to care for fetuses grown inside an artificial womb. According to Futurism:6

    “The system could theoretically allow parents to grow a baby in a lab, thereby eliminating the need for a human to carry a child. The researchers go so far as to say that this system would be safer than traditional childbearing.”

    As of now, the AI robot is only in charge of lab-raised animal embryos, as “experimentation on human embryos is still forbidden under international law.” However, that could change at any time. In May 2021, the International Society for Stem Cell Research went ahead and relaxed the rules7 on human embryonic experimentation.8

    Up until then, the rule had been that no human embryo could be grown in a lab environment beyond 14 days. Human embryos may now be grown beyond 14 days if certain conditions are met. In some countries, laws would still need to be changed to go beyond 14 days, but regardless, there’s no doubt that as transhumanism gets underway in earnest, ethical considerations about growing babies in laboratories will be tossed out.

    Combine the announcement of an AI robot nanny to care for lab-grown embryos with the 2018 announcement that Chinese scientists were creating CRISPR gene-edited babies. As reported by Technology Review, November 25, 2018,9 “A daring effort is underway to create the first children whose DNA has been tailored using gene editing.”

    The embryos were genetically edited to disable a gene called CCR5, to make the babies “resistant to HIV, smallpox and cholera.” The embryos were then implanted into a human mother using in vitro fertilization. At the time, the lead scientist refused to answer whether the undertaking had resulted in a live birth, but shortly thereafter it was confirmed that one trial participant had indeed given birth to gene-edited twins in November 2018.10

    In June 2019, Nature magazine published an article11 questioning whether the CRISPR babies might inadvertently have been given a shorter life span, as research had recently discovered that people with two disabled copies of the CCR5 gene were 21% more likely to die before the age of 76 than those with one functioning copy of that gene. The babies might also be more susceptible to influenza and autoimmune conditions, thanks to this genetic tinkering.

    Should We Breed Chimeras to Satisfy Need for Organs?

    Ethical considerations about animal-human hybrids (chimeras) will probably also fall by the wayside once transhumanism becomes normalized. Already, human-monkey hybrid embryos have been grown by a team of Chinese and American scientists.12

    The hybrid embryos are part of an effort to find new ways to produce organs for transplant patients. The idea is to raise monkeys with human-compatible organs that can then be harvested as needed. Here, the embryos were grown in test tubes for as long as 20 days — and this was done before the ISSCR officially agreed to relaxing the 14-day rule.

    The question is, if this kind of research ends up being successful, and the creation of animals with human organs is actually feasible, at what point does the chimera become a human?

    How do we know that what looks like a monkey doesn’t have a human brain, with the intelligence that goes with it? Taking it a step further, even, what’s to prevent scientists from growing human organ donors? Human clones, even? It’s a slippery slope, for sure.

    Privacy in the Age of Transhumanism

    Perhaps one of the greatest concerns I (and many others) have is that not only are we moving toward a merger of man and machine, but at the same time we’re also increasingly outsourcing human morality to machines. I cannot imagine the end result being anything but devastating. How did that happen? Timandra Harkness, a BBC Radio presenter and author of “Big Data: Does Size Matter?” writes:13

    “As the recent pandemic years have shown, the desire to be free from scrutiny unless there’s a good reason to be scrutinized is widely seen as, at best, eccentric and, at worst, automatic grounds for suspicion.

    We simply can’t articulate why a private life is valuable. We have no sense of ourselves as autonomous beings, persons who need a space in which to reflect, to share thoughts with a few others, before venturing into public space with words and actions that we feel ready to defend …

    Part of the appeal of technologies like AI is the fantasy that a machine can take the role of wise parent, immune to the emotion and unpredictability of mere humans. But this tells us less about the real capabilities of AI, and more about our disillusionment with ourselves.

    The urge to fix COVID, or other social problems, with technology springs from this lack of trust in other people. So does the cavalier disregard for privacy as an expression of moral autonomy.

    Technology ethics can’t save us, any more than technology can. Even during a pandemic, how we regard one another is the fundamental question at the root of ethics. So we do need to treat technology as just a tool, after all. Otherwise we risk being made its instruments in a world without morals.”

    Sources and References

    1, 4 Human Augmentation — The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project May 2021
    2 WEF The Fourth Industrial Revolution
    3 CNN November 26, 2019
    5, 6 Futurism February 1, 2022
    7 ISSCR Guidelines
    8 STAT News May 26, 2021
    9 Technology Review November 25, 2018
    10 AP News November 26, 2018
    11 Nature June 3, 2019
    12 Newsweek April 16, 2021
    13 Unherd January 2022

    • Gail Sheppard says

      I’ve thought about this, too (too much), and it seems they are teaching these military “things” to interpret situations in an effort to act without oversight.

      What could possibly go wrong?!

      Like all technology, there are bound to be problems in the beginning so this is my plan: If one of these AI guys sees me in a crowd formation situation, I’m going to screw with its “head” and start dancing wildly! That should confuse the trajectory in its logic long enough for me to “dance away”!!!

      I’m only half kidding.

      Do any of you have Grammarly? I do because I’m a terrible speller, but there is a payoff for allowing them to help me out. They’re getting to know me very well. Too well. They even put little icons at the bottom of what I’m writing to give me their opinion of the overall tone of my piece.

      Right now, they think I’m being assertive. I don’t know if that’s good or bad.

      Writing this last sentence brought me from “assertive” to “over the moon” happy. Watch, I’m going to make them angry: “I think their stuff is a piece of crap.”

      Oops! I went beyond “assertive” to MIA. They are no longer happy with me. Some day a cyborg is going to collect everything I’ve written for the last 5 years and determine I’m dangerous. Better say something positive for future posterity: “Aren’t the flowers beautiful today? I love early spring. The squirrels are out chasing each other around the trees in the sunlight.”

      OK, now I’m good. – As my mother used to say, “Watch your tone, young lady, or you’ll be sorry.” Indeed.

      • Grammarly is Applied Psychology in action.
        Under the guise of correcting your grammar, it sets out to first tame your thinking.
        Then there will be an update nudging you towards thinking appropriate thoughts.
        I expect Justin Trudeau wants it put on all the truckers’ iphones and laptops.

  7. Pfizer tells investors: “Things are not going well –
    We need to reveal the real facts about vaccines”

    Pfizer warns its investors about the “tsunami” of revelations that is coming!

    ‘ At a time when more and more autopsies are giving the Covid-19 vaccine as the official cause of death, Pfizer warns its investors about the “tsunami” of revelations that is coming!

    The US FDA will have to deliver the first monthly batch of 55,000 pages (out of a total of 455,000) of Pfizer clinical data on which the FDA based its licensing on the company’s vaccine.

    The FDA initially tried to escape by asking to deliver only 500 pages a month, something that would allow it to hide the truth until 95 2095! However, court rulings are speeding up this timetable, which directly affects the Big Pharma’s illegal status.

    Pfizer is known to have earned billions of dollars from vaccines, with the company’s CEO, Albert Bourla, recently celebrating the event. “What a quarter and what a year! Thanks to Pfizer colleagues, we have reached approximately 1.4 billion patients with our drugs and vaccines. This is more than 1 in 6 people on Earth. “Never before has our impact on patients been so widespread,” the Greek head of Pfizer said in a Twitter post.

    However, if the whole narrative collapses – something that is now more and more likely – the big pharmaceutical companies will suffer huge financial losses, while the situation will be even worse if it turns out that they obtained the specific drugs in an “illegal” way.

    In its most recent quarterly earnings report for 2021, Pfizer warned investors that things were not looking right. According to her announcements, the climate is not favorable for the company and the coronavirus vaccines, according to what newstarget claims .

    Many believe that a fundamental fraud and deception is now being uncovered in the database behind the fake “science” originally used by the FDA to authorize the Experimental Emergency Licensing (EUA) and then to approve the normal authorization of the Pfizer vaccine.

    Pfizer, in its 4th quarter earnings report for 2021, informs investors that there may be adverse new preclinical and clinical data or safety data and further analy[s]es of existing preclinical and clinical data or safety data or further information on preclinical quality and clinical or safety data, including control or inspection, revealed throughout this process.

    The report says “challenges due to misinformation” could push the company’s share price down, sending a message to investors that Pfizer profits will be affected by “concerns about clinical data integrity”.

    It should be noted that a few days ago the CEO of Moderna , Stephane Bancel, downloaded his twitter account and sold shares of his company, worth $ 400 million.

    The heat is on…

  8. Project Veritas Part 1
    FDA Exec on Camera Reveals Future COVID Policy
    “Biden Wants To Inoculate As Many People As Possible”

    [Video – 06:32]

    ‘ – FDA Executive Officer, Christopher Cole: “You’ll have to get an annual shot [COVID vaccine]. I mean, it hasn’t been formally announced yet ‘cause they don’t want to, like, rile everyone up.”

    – Cole on President Joe Biden: “Biden wants to inoculate as many people as possible.”

    – Cole on plans to approve vaccine for toddlers: “They’re not going to not approve [emergency use authorization for children five years old or less].”

    – Cole on pharmaceutical companies: “There’s a money incentive for Pfizer and the drug companies to promote additional vaccinations.”

    – Cole on the financial incentive for pharmaceutical companies: “It’ll be recurring fountain of revenue. It might not be that much initially, but it’ll be recurring — if they can — if they can get every person required at an annual vaccine, that is a recurring return of money going into their company.”

    – FDA Official Statement: “The person purportedly in the video does not work on vaccine matters and does not represent the views of the FDA.”

    [WASHINGTON, D.C. – Feb. 15, 2022] Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Executive Officer, Christopher Cole, inadvertently revealed that his agency will eventually announce that annual COVID-19 vaccinations will become policy.

    Cole is an Executive Officer heading up the agency’s Countermeasures Initiatives, which plays a critical role in ensuring that drugs, vaccines, and other measures to counter infectious diseases and viruses are safe. He made the revelations on a hidden camera to an undercover Project Veritas reporter.

    Cole indicates that annual COVID-19 shots isn’t probable — but certain. When pushed on how he knows an annual shot will become policy, Cole states, “Just from everything I’ve heard, they [FDA] are not going to not approve it.”

    The footage, which is part one of a two-part series on the FDA, also contains soundbites from Cole about the financial incentives pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer have to get the vaccine approved for annual usage.

    “It’ll be recurring fountain of revenue,” Cole said in the hidden camera footage. “It might not be that much initially, but it’ll recurring — if they can — if they can get every person required at an annual vaccine, that is a recurring return of money going into their company.”

    Perhaps the most explosive part of the footage is the moment where Cole brazenly talks about the impact that an Emergency Use Authorization has on overcoming the regulatory concerns of mandating vaccines on children.

    “They’re all approved under an emergency just because it’s not as impactful as some of the other approvals,” Cole said when asked if he thought there was “really an emergency for kids.”

    Cole, who claims his role with the FDA is to ensure the agency uses a framework of safety, security, and effectiveness as a part of its preparedness and response protocol, specifically cited concerns over “long term effects, especially with someone younger.” ‘

  9. Project Veritas Part 2

    FDA Executive Officer Exposes Close Ties
    Between Agency and Pharmaceutical Companies:

    [Video – 07:39]

    ‘Almost a Billion Dollars a Year Going into FDA’s Budget from the People we Regulate’

    ‘ • FDA Executive Officer Chris Cole: “The drug companies, the food companies, the vaccine companies. So, they pay us hundreds of millions of dollars a year to hire and keep the reviewers to approve their products.”
    • Cole on FDA fees: “Congress approved user fees for [the] FDA. Basically, we charge the industry millions of dollars in order to hire more drug reviewers and vaccine reviewers which will speed up the approval process. So, they [pharmaceutical companies] make more money.”
    • Cole: “They [FDA] tone down the impact of the user fees on their operations because they know they’re dependent on the drug companies, and the vaccine companies, and these other companies for their agency to operate.”
    • Cole on blowing the whistle: “There’s not an incentive to speak out in government, surprisingly. You would think there would be, but there’s not. It’s better just to just not say anything and just ignore it.”
    • Cole on retaliation in government: “You’ll be marked from getting other jobs because another office is not going to want to hire you if you’ve spoken out about something, right or wrong. They don’t look at what you’ve spoken out about. They’re just not willing to- government’s about rocking the boat and they don’t want to- which is the problem I have with- one of the problems I have with government is, like, they don’t like people rocking the boat, for right or wrong, at all costs. They want to hire a safe person that can do the job but doesn’t necessarily- is a great hire.”

    [WASHINGTON, D.C. – Feb. 16, 2022] Project Veritas published Part Two of its series on the FDA on Wednesday night which featured FDA Executive Officer, Christopher Cole, speaking about the inner workings of the agency including the FDA’s conflicts of interest, overspending, and why it’s hard for those within the agency to speak out on such abuses.

    In the footage, Cole talks about the impact that pharmaceutical companies have on the agency including the process for approving drugs.

    “A long time ago, Congress approved user fees for [the] FDA. Basically, we charge the industry millions of dollars in order to hire more drug reviewers and vaccine reviewers, which will speed up the approval process, so they make more money,” Cole says in the hidden camera footage.

    He then reveals that the FDA tones down the impact that these user fees have on the agency’s operations because, “they’re dependent on the drug companies, and the vaccine companies and these other companies for their agency to operate.”

    The incendiary footage, which features Cole talking about how the additional money the FDA brings in “gets banked” to be spent on “whatever you can, whether it’s right or wrong,’’ also features Cole discussing reasons why it’s difficult for anyone in government to speak out about practices he sees as “probably excessive.”

    “I don’t think there’s enough people saying — they’re, like, ‘Look, that’s fine, but that’s not right. So, we’re not going to charge that.’ You don’t want to be that person. You’re not going to have a long shelf life in the agency if you’re always that person,” Cole said.

    “There’s not an incentive to speak out in government, surprisingly. You would think there would be, but there’s not. It’s better just to just not say anything and just ignore it. The whistleblower, well, it’s high-profile whistleblower statutes and everything, that’s kind of ridiculous,” Cole said before adding “it’s better to just stay quiet and accept.”

    Cole’s LinkedIn page lists him as an Executive Officer within the agency’s Countermeasures Initiatives, which plays a critical role in ensuring that drugs, vaccines, and other measures to counter infectious diseases and viruses are safe. He made these revelations on a hidden camera to an undercover Project Veritas reporter.

    A spokesperson for FDA issued a statement yesterday saying, “The person purportedly in the video does not work on vaccine matters and does not represent the views of the FDA.”

    This statement appears to contradict a phone call released Wednesday afternoon by Project Veritas wherein Cole reiterated, during the conversation with Project Veritas Founder and CEO, James O’Keefe, that he is “a manager in the office that helps oversee the approval of the COVID vaccines for emergency approval.”

  10. “Why would anybody think this was a good idea?”

    With some trepidation, I’ll admit…I do.

    The basic idea of “harm reduction” programs like this is: with hard drugs, certain addicts aren’t realistically going to be able to go cold turkey and will keep using, and suffering not only the direct effects of the drugs but the infections/burns/etc that come with the dirty, broken equipment they do drugs with. So as part of a larger program, we’ll also provide clean mouthpieces, etc even knowing they’ll use them for drugs, because at least then they’re suffering fewer secondary injuries and their reliance on the program for the new equipment might at least keep them tethered enough to be helped by efforts to actually get them off drugs. It’s the same theory as behind the needle exchange programs that used to be so famous.

    Maybe this approach is wrong, and actually does more harm than good. But it seems sound enough to me–at the least, it seems like a reasonable thing for people to try in good faith.

    • Gail Sheppard says

      I see your point and I agree to a point.

      But crack pipes (as opposed to equipment) aren’t like needles or condoms and they can’t protect you from diseases while you get clean. White people use them, too, so I don’t know what Biden is trying to do by offering them to blacks as if they are all crack addicts!

      Perhaps he’ll use them as an incentive for black people to get their boosters like he’s used free services, money, gift certificates, and even donuts. I’m surprised any black person got the vaccine due to our nation’s history of making them guinea pigs. If I was strung out on crack, I wouldn’t even take a pipe from the government. I completely don’t trust them at all.

      Frankly, I’m one of the people who think Biden might be a plant (actor) to show Americans how wrong they got it when they elected him. No one can be that “out of it.” I started wondering about this when he fell UP the stairs getting onto a plane (whose tail had the wrong numbers to be AirForce One).

      My daughter is the only one I know who can fall upstairs and trust me, it’s not easy!

      • Gail,

        That is a perceptive observation and one I have alluded to in the past. The short list of those behind the scenes who really direct things to a large degree, the “Powers That Be” I call them, a small number of Davos/DS types whose calls are never declined, may have set up Biden to soften the transition to right wing government which they either approve or have resigned themselves to regardless of the wishes of the Uniparty political hacks at the top. The transition has to be palatable to the right people to avoid further unrest and political instability. If Biden fails badly enough, there’s not much the ideologues can do in denial of manifest reality.

      • For what it’s worth, this particular grant program isn’t directed towards black people–that part of the story came from a separate executive order (here: directing that federal resources focus on “underserved communities,” defined as “populations sharing a particular characteristic, as well as geographic communities, that have been systematically denied a full opportunity to participate in aspects of economic, social, and civic life.” Obviously the merits of that definition can be much debated.

  11. Draghi: The Unvaccinated Are Not Part of Our Society
    Martin Armstrong

    ‘ Mario Draghi has ruined the lives of 500,000 Italians after declaring, “The unvaccinated are not part of our society.” All Italians over 50 must now receive the vaccination to find employment or participate in society. Draghi is directly blaming the entire pandemic on those who did not conform. “We must never lose sight of the fact that most of the problems we have today are because there are non-vaccinated people,” Draghi told a news conference. “For the umpteenth time, I invite all those Italians who are not yet vaccinated to do so, and to get the third shot.”

    Hmm… when else in history has a leader blamed all of the country’s woes on a specific group of people and how did that end?

    Draghi’s new ruling began on February 15, where the government will demand businesses deem ALL unvaccinated workers over the age of 50 “unjustified absentees,” and they are to be suspended from work without pay. Beginning on June 15, those unjustified absences will turn into terminations. Those who do not bend will face a 100 euro fine, and could be fined up to 1,500 euros for violating the new law. This rule expands to the private sector as well as Italy pushes for every Italian to carry a Green Superpass that shows they have been vaccinated or recovered less than six months prior.

    Italians under 50 are still able to provide a negative rapid swab (valid for 48 hours) or a PCR swab (72 hours), but they will soon come for everyone.

    “It is important that those who will be restricted from today or who will be restricted can be part of it again, come back into society, together with all of us,” Draghi patronized. Italy has drawn a line – take the vaccine or we will destroy your ability to live. Half a million Italians just lost their jobs while likely at the height of their careers. Draghi is one of Schwab’s pawns, like Trudeau, who has no empathy for the people of his country. I believe the world is now seeing how much power politicians have over our lives as they can make them come to a screeching halt at a whim. ‘

    Italy takes the Fascist road – again…

  12. BTW, here’s the interview Dissident Mama did with yours truly.

  13. Babies could be killed 28 days after birth
    under proposed Maryland law, attorney warns

    Senate Bill 669 could be interpreted to allow for abortions through
    the first month after the baby is born, a legal analyst says.

    ‘ Legislation proposed in the Maryland Senate would allow babies to be left to die for as long as the first 28 days after birth, according to analysis from a pro-life attorney.

    Senate Bill 669 is also known as the Pregnant Person’s Freedom Act of 2022, but the problems go beyond the use of “person” in place of accurate references to women having babies. Senator William Smith, a Democrat, sponsored the legislation, which will have a hearing on March 15.

    “[T]he bill also proposes a revision of the fetal murder/manslaughter statute that would serve to handcuff the investigation of infant deaths unrelated to abortion,” American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) attorney Olivia Summers wrote in her analysis.

    This is because the legislation prohibits investigations and criminal prosecutions for women and medical professionals for a “failure to act” in relation to a “perinatal death.”

    “In other words, a baby born alive and well could be abandoned and left to starve or freeze to death,” Summers wrote, “and nothing could be done to punish those who participated in that cruel death.”

    She said that the language used is unclear, so the law could be interpreted to “prevent investigations into the death of infants at least seven days AFTER their birth, and may extend to infants as old as four weeks!”

    The Maryland Code does not define “perinatal,” Summers said. A 2020 law does define “perinatal care” as the “provision of care during pregnancy, labor, delivery, and postpartum and neonatal periods.”

    A definition on MedicineNet, a website owned by WebMD, defines it as “the 20th to 28th week of gestation” to “1 to 4 weeks after birth.”

    Summers, with the ACLJ, noted in her analysis that the state already has a safe haven law that allows parents to leave a newborn baby with a responsible adult without fear of prosecution.

    “Under the Safe Haven law, a distressed parent who is unable or unwilling to care for their infant can safely give up custody of their baby, no questions asked,” the Maryland Department of Human Services explains. “Newborns can be left at hospitals or law enforcement stations.”

    “There is absolutely no reason for Maryland Senate Bill 669’s attempt to prevent someone who lets their baby die from being investigated,” Summers said. ”This bill just further exposes the complete lack of regard abortion advocates have for innocent human life.”

    “If they truly want to protect life and women, then legislators could simply extend the length of the safe harbor provision already in place,” she said.

    Senator Smith, the bill’s sponsor, did not provide a comment on the ACLJ’s analysis of the legislation. The office responded to the initial email but did not comment any further. ‘

    Safe Harbor? Kill the kid? Decisions…decisions…

    Matt 18:10 ‘Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones…’ [KJV]

    • Archpriest Alexander F. C. Webster says

      RE: “‘Legislation proposed in the Maryland Senate would allow babies to be left to die for as long as the first 28 days after birth, according to analysis from a pro-life attorney.”

      Brendan, the notion of 28 days derives from a proposal many years ago by the execrable Peter Singer, Australian atheist and longtime professor of “bioethics” at Princeton University.

      At the time I called him a lunatic, ironically, because he concocted the 28-day rule for not assigning the term “person” to human newborns and allowing them to perish through human inaction based on the monthly lunar cycle. The mere possibility of his inhuman, demonic ideology becoming law in any part of the United States, or the world for that matter, is truly shocking, even in this age of abominations piled upon abominations.