So what’s a WHO Czar? 

It’s someone who will assume total control over global public health emergencies and dictate what the collective response will be. 

Who is the WHO Czar?

The Director General of WHO.  His name is Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (not an M.D.). 

Do we really want one man, who could be bought and sold by someone like Gates (the WHO’s largest single contributor) in charge of public emergencies (real or imagined)?    

Let me answer the question with another question.  Do you think the UN, the WHO, and Gates think climate change is a public “emergency?”   I assume everyone agrees they do.  What would the UN’s mission statement look like if 100% of the efforts of the entire planet were directed toward solving this one specific problem?

Probably something like this:  If it reduces CO2 (total population emitted CO2 per year), do it.  

How do you reduce CO2 emissions?

You get rid of people.  Lots of them.

The UN, in general, and the WHO, in particular, have very bad track records when it comes to sound judgment.  Polio eradication is a great example. 

In March 2019, I reported the WHO, under pressure from Gates, continued to vaccinate children with the oral polio vaccine even though it was causing more cases of polio than it was preventing due to the use of an attenuated (weakened, but alive) virus.  

In fact, polio had all but been eradicated in 2018 with just 33 cases in two countries, which were no longer thought to be contagious. 

The WHO wanted to stop the vaccination.  Gates did not with disastrous consequences. 

The United Nations has been forced to admit that a major international vaccine initiative is actually causing the outbreak of the very disease it was supposed to wipe-out

This really should be one of the biggest scandals in public health, but it’s given little attention mainly because of the high-profile nature of the people and organisations involved.

The United Nations has been forced to admit that a major international vaccine initiative is actually causing the outbreak of the very disease it was supposed to wipe-out.

While international organisations like the World Health Organization (WHO) will regular boast about supposedly ‘eradicating polio’ with vaccines, the opposite seems to be the case. Their decades-long campaign to eradicate polio is now killing scores of innocent young people living in poor countries.

Now it seems that health officials are beginning to admit that their plan to stop ‘wild’ polio is backfiring, as scores children are being paralyzed a deadly strain of the pathogen derived from a live vaccine – causing a virulent of polio to spread.

Ghebreyesus, who capitulated to Gates on polio vaccination will decide WHAT’s a public health emergency (after consulting with others), WHERE it is, and IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY STEPS to address it, unopposed. 

In theory, he could send us all into lockdown in FEMA camps if he wanted to, TEMPORARILY, of course.  Because “temporary” isn’t defined, I imagine it could be weeks, months, or years.

After what we went through with COVID, I think it’s pretty clear what life would be like going forward.  It is now commonly accepted that a virus was created in a lab, with the help of Fauci and the NIH, who worked closely together with Big Pharma, to come up with vaccines that have killed and maimed millions and millions of people worldwide.

This sort of thing would continue.  It’s hard to reach any other conclusion than it was an extinction event to dramatically cull the population that Gates, the son of the eugenic who founded Planned Parenthood, has been championing for years. 

Who can forget the claim Gates made in his remarks to the invitation-only Technology, Entertainment and Design 2010 Conference in Long Beach, CA?  His February address was titled “Innovating to Zero!” entitled “Innovating to Zero!

Gates presented a speech on global warming, stating that CO2 emissions must be reduced to zero by 2050. Gates said every person on the planet puts out an average of about five tons of CO2 per year.

“Somehow we have to make changes that will bring that down to zero,” he said. “It’s been constantly going up. It’s only various economic changes that have even flattened it at all. So we have to go from rapidly rising to falling, and falling all the way to zero.”

Gates presented the following equation: CO2 (total population emitted CO2 per year) = P (people) x S (services per person) x E (average energy per service) x C (average CO2 emitted per unit of energy)

“Let’s look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to zero,” he said. “Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero. That’s a fact from high school algebra.”

Discussing the “P,” or population portion of the equation, he stated, “Let’s take a look. First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent” [emphasis added].

There are 9.7B people in the world.  9.7B X 15% = The elimination of 1,454,000,000 people.  How do vaccines lower the population by 15%?  I think we’ve found out the answer to that in 2020.

Next week, 194 nations, with 3 delegates each, have agreed to vote on whether or not to make the changes to an agreement giving the Director General of the WHO, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, ultimate authority over public emergencies.  Many of our congressmen purportedly know nothing about this.  We don’t even know who our 3 delegates are.  If we don’t vote, it doesn’t matter.  The majority wins.

Please look at the safeguards been taken out of this document, by the U.S. I might add, giving total power to the UN.  

Pay specific attention to the proposed amendments to Article 12.

Please note that the areas that are “struck through” are some of the details within the amendments that would strip sovereignty away from all the nations of the world and hand it over to the WHO.

Again, with a majority vote of UN delegates, the transfer of United States sovereignty would shift to the WHO. 

What does “strip sovereignty” mean?  It means removing all authority a country would normally have as a sovereign nation in the event the Director General of the WHO declares a public health emergency.  We would be able to “advise” an emergency committee but would have no decision-making authority, thus losing our sovereignty as a nation.

Does there have to be a mutual agreement there is a public health emergency?   NO.  Let’s say the HHS and CDC decide there is still a COVID emergency, even though it is 99.97% curable, 80% of the population experiences no symptoms, and the virus has had the opportunity to run through the population several times over so it is likely 98% (guessing) of the population has been exposed.  The remaining 2% could be enough for the WHO to take immediate action because, frankly, they’re just looking for any reason at this point, to move ahead with their agenda on climate change.

Perhaps they will decide the lockdowns should be in the FEMA camps they built for this purpose.  Or that people can no longer gather in a group, like in a church or a monastery, as they are vectors for disease.  Or maybe they could mandate that the entire population stay in lockdown until every person from birth forward receives X# of vaccines.  Look at Australia.  That could be us. 

Please read the official letter.  It’s fairly short.  It lays it all out for you.

Also, go to this website to see who you can call and what you can do.  James Roguski is heading this effort.  You can even call him directly.  Here is his phone number:  310-619-3055

Lord have mercy!

Mrs. M



  1. George Michalopulos says

    Lord have mercy indeed! Not that we shouldn’t fight the good fight, but this looks like something only the Good Lord Himself can eradicate.

  2. Hilber Nelson says

    Our Metropolitan complied with church closing mandate in 2020, under the guise of following CDC guidelines and ‘the science.’ The question is, will he obey these self appointed WHO overlords if/when they declare Covid 2.0 or monkey pox mandates the shuttering of churches again (but not liquor stores)? Fool us once, shame on the secularists. Fool us twice, shame on the Church for obeying the secularists.

    • Gail Sheppard says

      I just started a post on this with the name “Fool us twice . . .”!

      • Looking forward to reading that post Gail, especially with the looming “threat” of monkeypox.

        Funny how this is coming out in conjunction with the new mandates from the WHO that give them insane powers over economies in event of a pandemic.

    • It may be a good time to start looking for catacombs and a few brave priests. We may even have to start learning how to identify and ignore bishops who choose to obey Nero rather than Christ.

      • George Michalopulos says

        I recommend house churches. If no priests are available, then assign ordained sr readers and do the weekly Typica service.

        Priests can “ride circuit” and serve the Eucharist on a rotating basis.

  3. Monkeypox is spread by sodomy, so there’s nothing to worry about if you’re not a degenerate.

  4. Anonymous II says

    ‘Imagine The Compliance’: Pfizer CEO Pitches Davos Elites On WiFi Microchip Pills

    Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla may have forgotten he was on camera this week, as he dazzled the audience at the World Economic Forum in Davos with fantasies of ingestible computer chips that signal authorities when a drug has been digested.

    “It is a, basically biological chip that is in the tablet. And once we take the tablet and dissolves into the stomach, sends a signal that you took the table. So imagine the applications of that – the compliance. The insurance companies know that the medicines patients should take, they take them.


    Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla explains Pfizer’s new tech to Davos crowd: “ingestible pills” – a pill with a tiny chip that send a wireless signal to relevant authorities when the pharmaceutical has been digested. “Imagine the compliance,” he says

    — Jeremy Loffredo (@loffredojeremy) May 20, 2022
    Reactions to Bourla’s dystopian pitch were about what one would expect – though Pfizer’s defenders chimed in claiming it could be used in “specific” conditions such as ‘schizophrenia and cancers’ to assure compliance.

    Right Said Fred is too sexy for Pfizer’s dystopia:

    And it’s us ‘conspiracy theorists’ who are the nutters.

    — Right Said Fred (@TheFreds) May 20, 2022
    “Compliance” he says – consumers are clearly not his customers, government bodies are. And Pfizer is fully aligned with “compliance” because it means more and more sales volume to their government customers.

    — GBR Dude ?☠️⚫️☠️⚪️ (@husker_backer) May 20, 2022
    Where have we heard this kind of thing before?

    World Economic Forum shill, Yuval Noah Hariri:

    “Covid is critical because this is what convinces people to accept to legitimize total biometric surveillance. We need to not just monitor people, we need to monitor what’s happening under their skin”

    — Maajid أبو عمّار (@MaajidNawaz) May 21, 2022
    As The Hill’s Kim Iverson tweeted in response to Bourla: Repeat after me: “I shall never scoff at so called conspiracy theorists again. I will listen and remain open minded that perhaps what they’re saying is actually happening.”


  5. Lenny Kavoulis says

    But, I thought Bean Sifnigos liked him because he is Ethiopian Orthodox.
    The same Sifnigos who worship’s Baruch Espinoza’s zoroastrian god.

  6. Gail Sheppard says

    So, it’s been decided. We have a Public Health Czar who can do whatever, whenever he wants. They’ve taken the sovereignty of 194, one of them being ours. (Caution with the language. I think this guy is a pastor I have NEVER heard this our of his before.)

    They are so much further down the road than I imagined and they are ready to spring into action. Those fast asleep are going to awaken to a nightmare.