Mostly pretty good, I think. I thought though, that with the bullet point “Do Orthodox Christians have any moral obligation to take the so-called “vaccines”/ boosters to “protect others” and obey the government?” Fr. Alexander I think was exactly correct to call this a canard and gas-lighting without a doubt, but a key thing that could have been added here is the fact that “asymptomatic spread” has now been completely, totally and entirely debunked, it is entirely a false construct with maybe some extremely rare case situation with very small window of possibility when someone may be “pre-symptomatic” and already pretty sick but not entirely and they are spreading stuff. However, Mike Yeadon, Peter McCullough and the likes regard “asymptomatic spread” in general just a “non-event” entirely. Even the WHO had initial statement stating that after analyzing numerous data worldwide that they have concluded there is no likelihood of any “asymptomatic spread,” but following day director Tedros had that statement walked back stating “we still do not know yet,” he was lying. So this notion of “vaxxing” because “you don’t know” and “you could have it and not know it” and be giving it to grandma and everyone else all false, all a lie, this was one of the four legs of a chair for vaxx mandate. So if you are sick, you are coughing, sneezing, spreading aerosols and droplets into the air, ones that carry a viral load, then yes, as an “Orthodox Christian” or any other Christian or religion you have “moral obligation” to keep yourself away from others whom you may infect, of course. To “protect others” from your own active infection which may spread. But if you are not sick, then NO, you are not spreading nothing to no one and being “vaxxed” or not vaxxed has nothing to do with nothing. Some other things that were pretty interesting, I liked about “natural immunity” and the archived studies by major universities demonstrating the conclusiveness of its effectiveness whereas “vaxx immunity” is only masking and not any kind of “immunity,” only thing the vaxxes are “effective” at is harm and injury and fatality, nothing else, maybe also masking of some symptoms at best.
George Michalopulos on Ragnarok, or Why Trump?: “How utterly graceless of Biden to not assign him a Secret Service detail. Presently, RFK Jr, is protected by Gavin…” Sep 19, 18:13
Brendan on A Perceptive Analysis of the Ukrainian Situation from GeorgeS: “Fresh from having [not] liberated Libya and helping Haiti descend into chaos, the Clintons now propose to assist Ukraine… https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/clinton-global-initiative-announces-new-proposal-to-help-rebuild-ukraine-provide-humanitarian-support/ar-AA1gTlIm” Sep 19, 16:04
Misha on Are We the Byzantines?: “Yes, I agree. Gnosticism is a bridge too far. In the past few days, I have become convinced that, absent…” Sep 19, 11:49
Albertovich on Are We the Byzantines?: “It is an excellent comment but I noticed “A religious or spiritual person sees everything in religious/spiritual terms. That is…” Sep 18, 22:06
Brendan on Ragnarok, or Why Trump?: “On The Bursting Of The Balloon… The bizarre secret behind China’s spy balloon https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-bizarre-secret-behind-chinas-spy-balloon/ [Video – 04:34] ‘ It was…” Sep 18, 06:29
Brendan on Ragnarok, or Why Trump?: “Armed Man Posing as U.S. Marshal Arrested at Kennedy Event https://www.kennedy24.com/armed_man_arrested_kennedy_event_celebrating_hispanic_heritage_month ‘ LOS ANGELES, CA—SEPT. 16, 2023—An armed man carrying…” Sep 18, 05:44
ere it is, folks!
Mostly pretty good, I think. I thought though, that with the bullet point “Do Orthodox Christians have any moral obligation to take the so-called “vaccines”/ boosters to “protect others” and obey the government?” Fr. Alexander I think was exactly correct to call this a canard and gas-lighting without a doubt, but a key thing that could have been added here is the fact that “asymptomatic spread” has now been completely, totally and entirely debunked, it is entirely a false construct with maybe some extremely rare case situation with very small window of possibility when someone may be “pre-symptomatic” and already pretty sick but not entirely and they are spreading stuff. However, Mike Yeadon, Peter McCullough and the likes regard “asymptomatic spread” in general just a “non-event” entirely. Even the WHO had initial statement stating that after analyzing numerous data worldwide that they have concluded there is no likelihood of any “asymptomatic spread,” but following day director Tedros had that statement walked back stating “we still do not know yet,” he was lying. So this notion of “vaxxing” because “you don’t know” and “you could have it and not know it” and be giving it to grandma and everyone else all false, all a lie, this was one of the four legs of a chair for vaxx mandate. So if you are sick, you are coughing, sneezing, spreading aerosols and droplets into the air, ones that carry a viral load, then yes, as an “Orthodox Christian” or any other Christian or religion you have “moral obligation” to keep yourself away from others whom you may infect, of course. To “protect others” from your own active infection which may spread. But if you are not sick, then NO, you are not spreading nothing to no one and being “vaxxed” or not vaxxed has nothing to do with nothing. Some other things that were pretty interesting, I liked about “natural immunity” and the archived studies by major universities demonstrating the conclusiveness of its effectiveness whereas “vaxx immunity” is only masking and not any kind of “immunity,” only thing the vaxxes are “effective” at is harm and injury and fatality, nothing else, maybe also masking of some symptoms at best.
Some people dread being red-pilled like a cat dreads water. They are coming around to the truth kicking and screaming.
https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/baths-cats_copy_4595.jpg
Thank you for this link.
I was unable to access the webinar live.
I look forward to viewing it and will pass the link on.
Engrossing…
Thank you.