Moderna Johnny-on-the-Spot

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel admits company produced 100,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses in 2019 before the pandemic started.

This would explain their ability to supply the following information to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in February 2020, summarizing key milestones in Moderna’s work to advance their vaccine. 

To say they “hit the ground running” would be an understatement considering the CDC reported the first laboratory-confirmed case of COVID January 20, 2020 and Moderna had already received the genetic sequence from China. 


Moderna’s Work on a Potential Vaccine Against COVID-19

Moderna is proud to be among the many groups working to respond to this continuing global health emergency. This page summarizes key milestones in our work to advance our vaccine candidate (mRNA-1273) and responds to frequently asked questions.

Timeline of our response through March 16, 2020



On January 11, 2020, the Chinese authorities shared the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus.



On January 13, 2020, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Moderna’s infectious disease research team finalized the sequence for mRNA-1273, the Company’s vaccine against the novel coronavirus. At that time, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of NIH, disclosed their intent to run a Phase 1 study using the mRNA-1273 vaccine in response to the coronavirus threat and Moderna mobilized toward clinical manufacture. Manufacture of this batch was funded by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).



On February 7, 2020, the first clinical batch, including fill and finishing of vials, was completed, a total of 25 days from sequence selection to vaccine manufacture. The batch then proceeded to analytical testing for release.



On February 24, 2020, the clinical batch was shipped from Moderna to the NIH for use in their Phase 1 clinical study.



On March 4, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) completed its review of the Investigational New Drug (IND) application filed by the NIH for mRNA-1273 and allowed the study to proceed to begin clinical trials.



On March 16, 2020, the NIH announced that the first participant in its Phase 1 study for mRNA-1273 was dosed, a total of 63 days from sequence selection to first human dosing.

This Phase 1 study will provide important data on the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273. Immunogenicity means the ability of the vaccine to induce an immune response in participants. The open-label trial is expected to enroll 45 healthy adult volunteers ages 18 to 55 years over approximately six weeks.



  1. Nate Trost says

    Bancel’s comments were about Moderna’s production capacity for mRNA vaccines in general, and not COVID-19 specifically. Moderna was in the research and trial stages of multiple non-COVID mRNA vaccines during 2019, and their production capacity was only sized to support that. You can get an overview of the existing mRNA vaccine candidates in their 2019 shareholders letter.

    • Gail Sheppard says

      He said it was for the pandemic. COVID was the only pandemic. mRNA was not used in vaccines because of the disastrous results in animal studies. It was used in cancer treatments. He was talking specifically about mRNA-1273, for COVID, which they were sequencing with the help of the NIH, which was completed 1/23/2020.

      Moderna didn’t do the initial research.

      In 2019, NIAID (Fauci’s group) established an Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Consortium with Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Units (VTEU) to do the clinical trials to be headed by co-principal investigators David S. Stephens, M.D., of Emory University, and Kathleen M. Neuzil, M.D., M.P.H., of the University of Maryland School of Medicine.,Clinical%20Trials%20of%20COVID%2D19%20Vaccines,vaccine%20known%20as%20mRNA%2D1273.

      VTEU Sites
      Baylor College of Medicine
      Principal Investigator (PI): Hana M. El Sahly, M.D.

      Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
      PI: Robert Wilson Frenck, Jr., M.D.

      Emory University
      PIs: Nadine G. Rouphael, M.D., Evan J. Anderson, M.D., Carlos del Rio, M.D.

      Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute
      PI: Lisa A. Jackson, M.D., M.P.H.

      New York University School of Medicine
      PI: Mark J. Mulligan, M.D.

      Saint Louis University
      PI: Daniel Hoft, M.D., Ph.D.

      University of Maryland School of Medicine
      PI: Karen L. Kotloff, M.D.

      University of Rochester
      PIs: Ann R. Falsey, M.D., Angela R. Branche, M.D.

      University of Washington
      PIs: Anna Wald, M.D., M.P.H., R. Scott McClelland, M.D., M.P.H.

      Vanderbilt University Medical Center
      PI: C. Buddy Creech, M.D., M.P.H.

      • Again, as outlined in the shareholders letter, Moderna had multiple Phase 1 human trials of mRNA vaccines going on in 2019 and prior (mRNA-1647, mRNA-1893, mRNA-1172, etc). They also had non vaccine mRNA treatments studies that included things like cancer treatments (mRNA-2416, mRNA-2752). Some of these efforts were partnerships with other companies. It also includes the details of their Norwood manufacturing facility which was being used to support their clinical trial and R&D efforts.

        Looking at the video clip, the context of the question was in terms of manufacturing in light of having to accommodate for different variants and whatnot. My transcription:

        “So the great news in terms of capacity versus 2020 where we are today is we have manufacturing capacity. As (Stef?) knows, when the pandemic happened, Moderna made 100,000 dose in 2019 for whole year. And I remember walking after Davos into the office of my head of manufacturing and say ‘how we make a billion dose next year?’ and he look at me a bit funny and say what? And I say, yeah, we need to make a billion dose next year, there’s going to be a pandemic.”

        He was speaking about Davos 2020, which happened in late January and the alarm bells were ringing for everybody in global health that COVID-19 was looking very bad. Moderna only made 100,000 doses of all their assorted mRNA candidates in 2019, and it was looking like they would need to somehow make a 1,000,000,000 doses in 2021. That’s the context of that video clip, not that Moderna had sequenced and manufactured a COVID-19 vaccine in 2019.

        Also, I suspect you may be conflating failed SARS-CoV-1 vaccine candidates (the original SARS), which result in liver damage in ferrets, with the mRNA vaccines developed for SARS-CoV-2. The former wasn’t a mRNA based vaccine.

        • Gail Sheppard says

          Yes, they developed a targeted a treatment for cancer, as I mentioned. (It just made the person sicker.)

          Yes, there were trials all over the country for the Moderna product, hence using the name “Moderna.” The company Moderna, however, was not in charge of the first clinical trials which I showed you. The NIH was. I gave you the names of the individuals who were responsible for the trials under the direction of the NIH.

          Yes, once they got they peddled first mRNA vaccine to the FDA, they started using the technology to produce other vaccines, which is why they were so enamored with the mRNA technology to begin with. As I have explained in the past, mRNA is what I call a “plug and play” system. You can attach any piece of RNA to it and it will work the same way, which is why they immediately went to work on other vaccines, i.e. mRNA-1647 (2021), mRNA-1893 (2021), mRNA-1172 (2020). That last one you mentioned really wasn’t new, though. They tweaked the COVID vaccine. Like SARS-CoV-2 and its spike protein, RSV uses the prefusion form of the F protein.

          Notice how NONE of them were started before the mRNA COVID vaccine. (It goes without saying that none of them are really vaccines, because they don’t block transmission, but I’m using that word for clarity.)

          The vaccine we are talking about is mRNA-1273. This vaccine is specific to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). It was not the one in the animal studies because SARS-CoV-2 didn’t exist. They did use a SARS-CoV spike protein and the mRNA technology, with disastrous results, which were not immediately evident.

          In the clip we provided, Bencel talked about gearing up for a pandemic that he said would happen the next year in 2020. There was only one. It was COVID-19.

          The problem is they’re now saying the virus spilled into the human population through a natural zoonosis process, similar to the SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV outbreaks. If it was a natural process, how could he know it was going to happen before it happened? And what about the Lancet report where the NIH told the scientific community it was going to do gain-of-function on SARs just so such a vaccine could be ready in case of this eventuality.

          It didn’t spill into the human population like a normal virus. They’re just trying to deflect responsibility. And now he’s got to explain how he knew about a natural process before it happened.

          • Gail Sheppard says

            I didn’t say anything about “starting” something. Even the first mRNA for SAR was being studied in animals long ago. I said “produce.” They didn’t produce them until after the 2020/2021 timeframe, if at all. Listing a study does not mean it has been evaluated by the U.S. Federal Government or is able to go into production.

            Yes, he was taking about manufacturing and gearing up for the pandemic. They started so earlier in 2019, they were able to have the manufacturing piece completed in the January/February timeframe in 2020. (I’d have to look it up.) They were not moving in a linear fashion. Many people were doing many things at once.

            Before we continue this discussion, you’ll need to transcribe his actual words off the clip so you can support what you’re saying rather than how you “remember” it in the context of what you think what he meant at future WEF meeting. We’re talking about what he told a reporter. Not the WEF.

  2. Christopher says

    They do not call it the “Plan-demic” for nothing. For decades a “controlled demolition” of an society that had moved too far into an undesirable state had been thought of as an emergency measure by various round table groups representing the leaders of the world. The plan-demic was devised in order to attempt to regain control of society to keep it on the course of developing into the diabolical authoritarian technocratic neo-feudalistic dream which freemasons had intended to eventually see realized for the last century. As the world turned away from God and from the Church, so this came to pass. May God have mercy on us and save us through daily repentence. to the glory of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, to which are due all honour and dominon, throughout the ages of ages. Amen.

  3. James O’Keefe Is on Paid Leave From Project Veritas

    ‘ James O’Keefe, the founder and chairman of Project Veritas, has taken a paid leave from the conservative nonprofit media organization as its board considers whether to remove him from his leadership position, according to current and former employees of the organization. … ‘

    Perhaps Pfizer is angry…

    • Gail Sheppard says

      They have a tip line so I wrote: Here’s a tip for you: when you have an employee problem, go to HR. Don’t go to the Internet. I donated money to you and now I wish I could take it back!

      I’ve never heard of something so crazy.

      • I’m sorry Gail, I may have accidentally posted an earlier comment… I was a bit confused about what you and Brendan had been discussing (the NYMag article was behind a paywall for me). But I’ve pieced it together from other news websites now.

        I have to disagree with you here. This was not a situation where one could simply go to HR. The culprit is the company CEO, and it’s on record that he already fired two senior executives who had the audacity to question his leadership. Add to this the fact that the man seems like a bit of a paranoid maniac (e.g. administering lie detection tests to employees), then one can probably begin to imagine why going solo to HR is not a good idea.

        Yes, when your problem is with the CEO, HR is unlikely to be of much assistance. That’s why the memo prepared by the employees was sent directly to the Board – which is in fact in a position to discipline the CEO.

        The rest of the stuff on the Internet is not the employees “going to the Internet instead of HR”, but a reaction to that decision of the board to essentially sack O’Keefe. They are calling it “paid leave”, because it seems that there may not be a Project Veritas without O’Keefe in the picture, so they’re kinda stuck with him until they figure a way out.

        Isn’t it good that this became public knowledge, so that you know not to donate to this organization any more? Why would you want to be “in the dark” about someone’s criminal behavior, as long as you were aligned ideologically? This is how much of the left operates. Let’s not be like them.

        • Gail Sheppard says

          James O’Keefe is Project Veritas and they just tanked their operation. Pfizer may have gotten to them. If Pfizer can incentivize people to kill other people, they could probably talk anyone into anything.

          Having worked in the corporate world, they would not have put a person who purportedly did all this on a “well deserved” paid leave, as they characterized it. They would have terminated him and announced he was pursuing other opportunities or something innocuous like that. Now they have a defamation case on their hands, but again, if you’re paid enough to tank your own company you could just walk away. That would include everyone who signed that letter. (It reminds me of that letter to Elon Musk which I also think is mickey mouse.)

          I don’t think O’Keefe could be bought by Pfizer and the timing is suspect. I don’t know him, obviously, but I bet he’s going to come back with a vengeance over all this, assuming he’s OK. People are saying they can’t get in touch with him which is frankly very concerning. He could release a statement from Hawaii or Pittsburgh or wherever he is. I seriously hope he’s OK.

          • It’s nice to know you’re worried about Mr. O’Keefe, but I doubt Pfizer paid him to be a bully to his employees over the course of years.

          • This is an explanation of O’Keefe’s removal I came across yesterday that I believe deserves some investigation. Mike Gill is on FB. I will warn in advance that Gill’s interviewer in this broadcast is extremely foul-mouthed and is having to interview Gill via phone because allegedly the cartels running our country have a hit out on him and Gill is on the run with few resources (no computer). There is a technical glitch in the beginning of the interview where the worst of the profanity occurs. Given the current global powers and the stranglehold they seem to have on our gov’t, media and big tech, I tend to find whistleblowers who are in dire straits (Gill) more credible than those sitting pretty and enjoying a significant media presence and platform (up until very recently, O’Keefe). Gill’s account sounds very plausible to me, but it is not comforting news to those buying in on any level to there being a political “good guy” on the horizon that could somehow come in to save the day in our country. Our salvation from this mess can come only from an act of God, likely using the reality that evil, in the end, contains the seeds of its own self-destruction.


        • “Why would you [imply]…someone [has committed] criminal behavior?”
          Ask Trump.

          “This is how much of the left operates. Let’s not be like them.”


    ‘ Swiss author Pascal Najadi walked into his local police station and filed a repor[t] of a crime; against his President and Minister of Health for lying about safety of C19 bioweapon shots. Now the country’s Attorney General is investigating and our own officials could be indicted. … ‘

    [Video – 52:48]

    This is a lucid exposition of the criminal case filed against the President
    and Health Minister of Switzerland for making false statements about
    the COVID ‘vaccinations’ and the injuries resulting therefrom…

  5. Margaret Karakas says

    Dr. Anthony Fauci is now “among the growing number of officials” who are acknowledging that the COVID-19 vaccines “don’t work well against infection”; saying that the vaccines against both COVID-19 and influenza have “deficiencies,” including that they “elicit incomplete and short-lived protection against evolving virus variants that escape population immunity.” Well no shit Sherlock! They were NEVER designed to protect, but to KILL by destroying the body’s natural capacity to heal from within causing an avalanche of issues in those with co-morbidities designed to depopulate the world of the so-called “deplorables”.

    With newer strains emerging, thanks to the gain of function mRNA spike protein, the so called “virus” proliferates and spreads becoming THE VIRUS of the future as they intended.
    Of course Fauci is using this half-assed quasi-admission to then propose yet more harmfully damaging vaccines soon be rolled out from the assembly death plants at Moderna, Pfizer and
    J & J etc,. It is all crap. I don’t care what they say, the vax is the mark of the devil.

    If Fauci was sincere in his outright admission of “deficiencies”, then I say, okay Anthony, you’re a big boy, how about you and everyone who stood proudly, arrogantly with the “science” surrender the BILLIONS you bilked humanity world wide by having this knowledge from the beginning. You and countless others were and are still indeed THE problem and colluded with other governments to roll out a bioweapon designed to kill with fear of the unknown if people didn’t comply. What kind of b.s. is this?! How about that for trust in the NIH? Sorry, my fear is grounded in being separated from GOD while living or dead, not fear of dying itself as they would believe with the “science”.

    As far as I’m concerned, Fauci et al are culpable just as the Tobacco Industry was in lacing cigarettes with additives and addictive chemicals. May the mass tort law suits commence crippling these fake pharmaceuticals until they no longer have a stranglehold on humanity.

    David Wiseman, a former Johnson & Johnson scientist, noting saying this earlier in the
    plan-demic that “That is just an amazing admission,” as officials portrayed people as only needing a primary series of a COVID-19 vaccine for near-perfect protection. Fauci infamously claimed in 2021 that vaccinated people “become a dead end to the virus” and “herd immunity” would be achieved when enough people got a shot.

    Ever since then, experts have been acknowledging the limitations of the vaccines, which are in fact performing worse against the newly dominant strain in the United States. Dr. David Kessler, who was Biden’s chief science officer for COVID-19 until mid-January, said recently that the vaccines “do not prevent infection or transmission”. Enough said???

    • The (previous, ha…ha!) assertion that herd immunity was possible in the case of any Corona virus was utterly ridiculous on its face.

      They might just easily claimed to have developed a “safe and effective” vaccine against the common cold.

  6. Steve Kirsch: What funeral directors know that you don’t

    In 78 years, they never had a 15 year old who died from a heart attack. In December 2022, they had 1 a week for three weeks straight. Nobody is talking about it publicly.

    Executive summary

    ‘ Ever since the vaccines rolled out, deaths are up, particularly among young people.

    I talked to the owner of many funeral homes across the US; collectively they handle over 3,000 funerals a year. He asked that his name be kept confidential for fear of retribution.

    Overall, their business is up by 50% after the vaccines rolled out and it’s not proportional… young people are a greater portion of the deaths.

    For example pilot deaths at Southwest Airlines are up six-fold after the vaccines were mandated.

    My source said that normally they’d see 1 stillbirth/month pre-vaccine. After the vaccines rolled out, they were seeing as many as 12 stillbirths a month. But they noted that many hospitals will dispose of these cases directly and NOT involve the funeral home, so they are only seeing a fraction of these deaths; the actual increase could be much larger than the 12X increase they observed.

    In the 78 years they’ve been in business, they can’t recall ever having seen a 15-year old die from a heart attack. In December 2022, they had 1 a week for three weeks straight.

    A very experienced nurse I consulted had never even heard of a 15-year old with a heart attack in her entire career. Now, she hears of these cases on a regular basis.

    These funeral homes are also seeing the strange rubbery clots that they’ve never seen before.

    The medical examiner was called and verified it, but nobody is saying anything publicly for fear of being fired.

    Basically, ever since 2021, they have been seeing very strange things: stillbirths, number of “found dead,” healthy people having heart attacks and strokes, blood clots, etc. They’ve never seen anything like that before; it’s a “noticeable” difference.

    Like most funeral homes, they don’t tally statistics but they remember the anecdotes. The most noticeable thing is that the events are happening disproportionally to younger people (i.e., people under 65).

    So if elderly deaths are only up by 15%, but younger age groups are increased by 100% or more, the overall all-cause mortality for all ages will only increase modestly (since younger people rarely die).

    Also, the CDC stats for 2022 say that the data is not fully reported due to reporting delays. This means checking with funeral directors is a way to estimate what is happening in real-time.

    Bottom line: everyone knows what is causing this, but they are all afraid to speak out. For the few who do speak out, their stories are never covered in the mainstream media.
    If kids dying of heart attacks are up by 100X over normal, why aren’t we seeing it in the all-cause mortality stats for young people?

    It’s simple… kids under 16 dying from heart attacks pre-vax is nearly 0. So even after a 100X increase, it’s still a negligible number compared to overall all-cause child deaths (from accidents, cancer, etc).

    So this is why you can have dramatic increases in key categories of death, even though the all-cause death rates for the larger category aren’t significantly increased.

    However, despite this, the most important thing is the all-cause mortality numbers for everyone, and those are still up, which is very unusual as noted here.
    Petition for the FAA to investigate 6X increase in pilot deaths

    Pilot deaths at Southwest airlines used to average 1 or 2 a year. Now they are dying at a rate of around 1 a month.

    Mike Gollins tried to get signatures on a petition to the FAA to investigate these deaths, but found that even though people agree this is important to investigate, they were too afraid to sign the petition

    I hope to have something in the next few days. I want to make sure the data is reliable. Stay tuned. I’ve been spending a lot of time on this work which is why I haven’t been publishing new content for a few days.


    We have anecdotal evidence that the vaccines are causing great harm:

    Stillbirths up by over 10X post-vax rollout.

    Pilot deaths are up by 6X or more.

    Young people (such as 15 year olds) dying of heart attacks are up by over 100X above normal.

    The mainstream medical community will continue to remain silent in order to keep their jobs. Not a single one will ask for the data transparency (exposing correlated death-vaccine records) that would enable the truth to be revealed.

    Basically, the medical community believes that we need to keep the data hidden and kept from public view; otherwise, they would be fired (or lose their medical license).

    Also, if the data was made public, people would find out the truth and lose faith in the medical community. If people lost trust in their doctors, they wouldn’t follow their advice to take the vaccine anymore. We can’t have that!

    That’s how science works today. ‘

  7. George Fleming says

    Figes says Russians used to cook almost exclusively with hemp seed oil, which makes the Brittany Griner case pure hypocrisy. ANd also explains they nuttiness.

  8. I recently saw an article from Dr. Joseph Mercola in which he reports: “Recent polling shows 49% of Americans believe the COVID shots may be responsible for the massive rise in sudden deaths and 28% say they know someone they believe was killed by the shots.”

    This analysis by a doctor in the Midwest publishing on Substack is revealing:

  9. Truth will out…

    David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, Anthony S. Fauci:
    Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses,
    influenza viruses, and other respiratory viruses

    ‘ Viruses that replicate in the human respiratory mucosa without infecting systemically, including influenza A, SARS-CoV-2, endemic coronaviruses, RSV, and many other “common cold” viruses, cause significant mortality and morbidity and are important public health concerns. Because these viruses generally do not elicit complete and durable protective immunity by themselves, they have not to date been effectively controlled by licensed or experimental vaccines. …

    Until the emergence of COVID-19, influenza had for many decades been the deadliest vaccine-preventable viral respiratory disease, one for which only less than suboptimal vaccines are available. …

    As pointed out decades ago, and still true today, the rates of effectiveness of our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases. …

    …the non-systemically replicating respiratory viruses, apparently including SARS-CoV-2,
    tend to repeatedly re-infect people over their lifetimes without ever eliciting complete and durable protection. …

    Taking all of these factors into account, it is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines. This observation raises a question of fundamental importance: if natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we expect vaccines, especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so? …

    Durably protective vaccines against non-systemic mucosal respiratory viruses with high mortality rates have thus far eluded vaccine development efforts. … ‘

    So Fauci admits the COVID jab does not work.

    However, note the wording of the following:
    ‘…especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines’.

    Is this a warning to look out for
    ‘…systemically administered replicating vaccines’?

    • RE: “. . . if natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we expect vaccines, especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so?”

      Frankly, short-term immunity was all they were probably going for as they didn’t expect the vaccinated to live all that long. Thankfully, they didn’t even get that right.

      • “…they didn’t even get that right”

        …so far

        On another point:

        ‘ Viruses that replicate in the human respiratory mucosa without infecting systemically, including influenza A, SARS-CoV-2, endemic coronaviruses, RSV, and many other “common cold” viruses… ‘

        If a virus does not infect systemically, why would
        we need a systemically administered vaccine?

        Specifically a systemically administered spike toxin?

  10. Nick Sortor:

    ‘ After 13 days, Biden’s EPA admin FINALLY showed up in East Palestine.

    I thought he’d need something to drink after walking so much, so I generously offered him a glass of tap water.

    He declined. ‘

  11. Health Alert on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Safety

    February 15, 2023

    ‘ The COVID-19 pandemic brought many challenges that the health and medical field have never encountered. Although the initial response was led by a sense of urgency and crisis management, the State Surgeon General believes it is critical that as public health professionals, responses are adapted to the present to chart a future guided by data.

    The State Surgeon General is notifying the health care sector and public of a substantial increase in Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports from Florida after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

    In Florida alone, there was a 1,700% increase in VAERS reports after the release of the COVID-19 vaccine, compared to an increase of 400% in overall vaccine administration for the same time period (Click on link above to see chart).

    The reporting of life-threatening conditions increased over 4,400%. This is a novel increase and was not seen during the 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaign. There is a need for additional unbiased research to better understand the COVID-19 vaccines’ short- and long-term effects.

    The findings in Florida are consistent with various studies that continue to uncover such risks. To further evaluate this, the Surgeon General wrote a letter to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) illustrating the risk factors associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and emphasizing the need for additional transparency.

    According to a study, Fraiman J et al, Vaccine. 2022, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events, including coagulation disorders, acute cardiac injuries, Bell’s palsy, and encephalitis. This risk was 1 in 550 individuals, which is much higher than other vaccines.

    A second study, found increased acute cardiac arrests and other acute cardiac events following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.,

    Additionally, Dag Berild J et al, JAMA Netw Open. 2022, assessed the risk of thromboembolic and thrombocytopenic events related to COVID-19 vaccines and found preliminary evidence of increased risk of both coronary disease and cardiovascular disease.,

    While the CDC has identified safety signals for stroke among individuals 65 and older following the bivalent booster administration, there is a need for additional assessments and research regarding safety of all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

    To support transparency, the State of Florida reminds health care providers to accurately communicate the risks and benefits of all clinical interventions to their patients, including those associated with the COVID-19 vaccine as additional risks continue to be identified and disclosed to the public. ‘

    Joe Ladapo is not for letting go…

  12. Dr. John Campbell: Viral origins, the stitchup

    [Video 14:59]

    ” On 12 September 2019 the Wuhan Institute of Virology,
    took its entire virus database offline

    The renewed publication of this virus database would be an important step towards clarifying the origin of the current ‘corona pandemic’. ”

    WHO abandons plans for crucial second phase of COVID-origins investigation

    The WHO now does Three Monkey Science.
    Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil of Pharma.