Comments Posted By Knows the Score
Displaying 1 To 10 Of 10 Comments
“Y’all are a bunch of sadists who would crucify the boy who pointed out the obvious.”
Who might that be? Mark Stokoe? Even Kishkovsky dumped him when he became a liability. Face it Kraeff, you were duped.
» Posted By Knows the Score On May 14, 2013 @ 10:21 pm
Right. The first guy steals money and is shagging some guy or girl (probably guy). They fire him. The guy called in to replace him sees sexual signals when a mother changes her babies diapers. Looking real good.
Wait! A better idea! Let’s hire the fired guy and make him an OCA bishop! Maybe we could land a sexual minority!
» Posted By Knows the Score On May 14, 2013 @ 9:58 pm
You impress me Kraeff. First an expert in canon law and now a psychiatrist. Oh the wisdom!
» Posted By Knows the Score On May 14, 2013 @ 9:54 pm
Won’t call slander by its name Stankovich? Wont repudiate the false charges of hiding a rape?
Why anonymous? Look what they did to Met. Jonah. With your record, you would cheer the destruction of my reputation just as you do his.
» Posted By Knows the Score On May 14, 2013 @ 9:51 pm
“This is a false impression in that it places “our dear sane Jonah” among a band of sexual deviants with clinicians set on “discovering” deviancy. SLI is a licensed & accredited psychiatric facility which happens to provide a specialized research & treatment program for sexually-offending clergy.”
Let’s extract the sarcasm out of this sentence and see what a true impression would look like: Our dear insane Jonah was placed in a stable psychological facility.
You wont comment on the STINKBOMB letter because you agree with it. Silence implies consent.
» Posted By Knows the Score On May 14, 2013 @ 1:32 pm
Stankovich will bray in support of St. Lukes until his dying day. He avoids addressing the STINKBOMB letter that way. Washburn thinks wisdom is defining sides and putting himself in the middle. Kraeff was duped.
» Posted By Knows the Score On May 14, 2013 @ 7:46 am
No “information cascade” here. The WE ARE THE LEGACY site that you and your presumptuous cohorts created pushed homosexuality front and center (I AM A SCIENTIST! YOU ARE A MORON! SHUT UP!).
Fr. Jillions was part of that. His sexual minorities fabulation was contained in link hosted on your site.
What about that STINKBOMB letter, Stankovich? Any comment? Justifying it by your silence? Defending the indefensible because your friends wrote it?
» Posted By Knows the Score On May 2, 2013 @ 6:49 am
Stankovich is being cagey here. The Jillions cv where sexual minorities was mentioned was not carried on his site. It was only a link.
» Posted By Knows the Score On April 29, 2013 @ 7:41 am
Oh please. As soon as the war against +Jonah became public with the leaked Stokoe emails, you and your cohorts come out with WE ARE THE LEGACY and you start your gay-I-am-a-scientist drivel. Overnight you elevate homosexuality as the pressing issue in the OCA. You did that Stankovich, no one else.
The LEGACY effort ends up with the STINKBOMB letter, not directly but your silence about it speaks volumes. You still bark “I am a scientist!” over and over but you dare not say anything about the slander. It is indefensible and you know it but you helped create the self-justifications that excused it. That’s YOUR legacy.
» Posted By Knows the Score On April 29, 2013 @ 7:39 am
«« Back To Stats Page
No “bucket of customary blah blah blah” here Stankovich. Nice try at purloining the point though.
It’s because Fr. Jillions is “Chancellor of the Orthodox Church in America” that he owes his readers an explanation. “Sexual minorities” is a demographic category based on behavioral characteristics he created out of thin air. What can it possibly mean except to what it alludes: homosexual behavior deserves its own theological placement.
You don’t speak for him no matter how loud you roar. Let him answer the question himself.
» Posted By Knows the Score On April 26, 2013 @ 1:57 pm